Legal Opinion

Branscomb v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 11, 2005No. A05A0848PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Following the denial of his motion for new trial, Alan Branscomb appeals his conviction of possession of cocaine. He charges the trial judge with having violated OCGA § 17-8-57 by challenging the credibility of defense witnesses and by commenting on the evidence in the presence of the jury, and he charges his trial attorney with ineffective assistance in failing to raise a “continuing witness” objection. Finding no deficiency in counsel’s performance and no reversible error by the trial court, we affirm.

The state’s evidence showed that agents from the Metro Narcotics Task Force…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Paul v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Hufstetler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Steed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Walsh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  4. Jemal David Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. Steven Spires v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API