Legal Opinion

Ohio Power Co. v. Davidson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1933No. 24497PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By LONES, J.

Sec 4227-6 GC provides in so far as it is applicable to this case that whoever seeks to propose an ordinance in a municipality by initiative petition “shall before circulating such petition file a duly verfied copy of the proposed ordinance or measure with the city auditor if it be a city.”

The requirement that a duly verified copy of the proposed ordinance be filed with *488the auditor before the petition is circulated is mandatory and not merely discretionary. Substantial compliance with this provision is essential to the validity of the petition and to the jurisdiction of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edward Rose of Ohio, Inc. v. McLaughlinOhio Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Garzia v. MurrayLake County Court of Common Pleas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API