Wardell v. McMillan

URBIGKIT, Justice,

concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which GOLDEN, Justice, joins on the issue regarding the trial court’s control of discovery as a third concern.

I concur in the decision and in the dispos-itive opinion except in ancillary regard involving four distinguishable areas. Those differences which do not, however, foreclose concurrence in the result, include: (1) use of prejudicial-partial individual trial ju*1073rors; (2) voir dire expansion to establish or foreclose existence of general juror prejudice by institutional advertising campaigns; (3) discovery privilege for the…