Legal Opinion

Ault v. Purcell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 18, 1974No. 393-359; 393-360; 393-361PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

This is a consolidated appeal of three orders dismissing writs of habeas corpus and remanding the petitioners for extradition. Except as noted, the cases present identical issues.

The petitions allege in conclusory fashion that the extradition papers do not comply with statutory requirements, that the governor, as a non-judicial officer, cannot issue a constitutionally valid warrant, and that the petitioners are therefore wrongfully held. They do not deny the truth of the requisition or warrant. Nor do they allege that the petitioners are not the persons named in the warrant.

As to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fredericks v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. Yarbrough v. SniderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. Mays v. ShieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department of Multnomah County v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. State Ex Rel. Hood v. PurcellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vetsch v. Sheriff of Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  2. Wise v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State ex rel. Groves v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Grant v. ShobeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API