Legal Opinion

Kolensky v. Defrancesco

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 30, 1925PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee C ubi am.

The jury might reasonably have found that the defendant’s husband, while operating an automobile, ran against and knocked down plaintiff while she was crossing Campbell Avenue in West Haven, and that the negligence of the operator of the automobile was the proximate cause of the accident, to which the plaintiff in no wise contributed. The only question in the case which furnished the slightest basis for the appeal, was the claim of the defendant that the evidence did not enable the jury to find that the automobile at this time was being operated by an agent of the defendant while…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wolf v. SulikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  2. Stuart v. DoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Koops v. GreggSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  2. Fox v. LavenderUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. McLaurin v. McLaurin Furniture Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Baker v. ParadisoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Seney v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API