Legal Opinion

Connor Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1940No. 25521. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farthing

Harold Cleary was shot and killed February 12, 1938. He left Cecelia Cleary, his widow, and two dependent daughters. He was employed as a traveling salesman for the Kinsey & Mahler Company, now the Connor Company, the plaintiff in error. One of his duties was to collect accounts for his employer, which was engaged in the wholesale plumbing supply business.

Cleary had heard that the city of Havana, Illinois, was going to extend its waterworks system. On Saturday morning, February 12, 1938, Cleary, after borrowing $5 from a customer in Havana, and obtaining some gasoline on credit, met Evert…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Empire Health & Accident Insurance v. PurcellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Ridenour v. LewisNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Sure Pure Ice Co. v. Industrial CommissonIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Mt. Olive & Staunton Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Jersey Ice Cream Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. C. A. Dunham Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. White v. Atlantic City PressSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Grola v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Allison v. Brown & Horsch Insulation Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954
  5. Cinch Manufacturing Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API