Legal Opinion

Trinity University v. McFarland

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1881No. 1230, Op. Book No. 3, p. —Published

Appeal from Limestone County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Walker, R. S., P. J.

§ 1309. Contract; rescission of ’;party seeking, must act promptly; acquiescence will bar right to rescind. “A court of equity will not rescind a contract unless fraud appear, or there has been a plain and palpable mistake affecting the very substance of the subject matter of the contract. [5 Wait’s Act. & Def. 510.] Nor will equity interfere to rescind a contract where an adequate remedy at law exists. [121 Mass. 227; 22 Ark. 198.] A contract may be rescinded by the acts of the parties to it, without there being an express and formal agreement to that effect;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Memphis & Charleston Railroad v. NeighborsMississippi Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Barfield v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Ludington v. RenickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Heald v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Peay v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1860

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API