Legal Opinion
Security Nat. Fire Ins. Co. v. Schott Drug Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 4, 1937No. 10310PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
The principal question for decision in this case is, Did appellee breach the ironsafe warranty clause contained in the policies of insurance issued by the respective appellants, and which is quoted in the next paragraph, and thus void its policies?
"Record Warranty Clause (Applied to Stock only)
"The following covenant is hereby made a part of this policy and a warranty on the part of the assured:
"Section 1. The Assured will take a complete itemized inventory of stock on hand at least once in each calendar year, and within twelve months of the last preceding inventory, if such has been taken.
"Un…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Dorroh-Kelly Mercantile Co. v. Orient InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Merchants' & Manufacturers' Lloyd's Ins. Exch. v. Southern Trading Co. of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Roberts, Willis & Taylor Co. v. Sun Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Western Assur. Co. v. ReddingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Security National Fire Insurance v. Schott Drug Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939