Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Maurer v. Young Life

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 18, 1989No. 87SC481Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMullarkey, Justice

Although my analysis is different, I agree with the majority that the Property Tax Administrator (Administrator) could not appeal a decision of the Board of Assessment Appeals (Board) until the right to seek judicial review was statutorily conferred upon her by the enactment of section 39-2-117(6), 16B C.R.S. (1988 Supp.), effective beginning in the 1984 tax year. This new section was part of H.B. 1583 entitled “Concerning Tax Appeals” which added several new statutory sections and amended others in order to permit the Administrator to seek judicial review of decisions by the Board of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Tilton v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. Wimberly v. EttenbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  4. Colorado General Assembly v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. Cloverleaf Kennel Club, Inc. v. Colorado Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API