Legal Opinion

Schmidt & Zeigler v. John G. Rost & Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 1878No. 321, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 243Published

Appeal from Galveston County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 684. Beconvention; requisites and sufficiency of plea in. Schmidt & Zeigler sued on two promissory notes for $250 each. Defendants pleaded specially in reconvention for $5,000 damages done them by plaintiffs by means of a circular letter which plaintiffs addressed to the creditors of defendants, advising said creditors not to accept an assignment or proposition of Eost & Co. for a composition of their debts at twenty cents on the dollar. The plaintiffs excepted to this plea in reconvention, and moved the court to strike it out as being irrelevant and insufficient in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Egery v. PowerTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Walcott v. HendrickTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Thomas v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Carothers v. ThorpTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Pinson v. KirshTexas Supreme Court · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API