Greene v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & Development

HPD’s determination that the subject apartment was not petitioner’s primary residence, a violation of his occupancy agreement, which incorporated the terms of a 1987 regulatory agreement between the City and Mutual, is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Kaufman v New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev., 45 AD3d 257 [2007]; Matter of Howard o New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev., 294 AD2d 278 [2002], Iv denied 99 NY2d 504 [2002]). Petitioner admitted that he resided in another location, he offered no evidence that he had ever resided in the subject apartment, and he…