Legal Opinion

State v. Sanders

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1977No. 37420PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Presiding Judge.

A jury found defendant guilty of felonious assault and the trial court sentenced *40him to five years’ imprisonment. On appeal defendant raises a single point — that the trial court erred in giving the “hammer instruction” (MAI-CR 1.10) after it had learned the jurors were deadlocked at nine to three for conviction. The relevant proceedings:

After deliberating two hours the jury foreman sent the judge a note saying, “The Jury can’t agree on a verdict. There are 9 for guilty and 3 for not guilty.” Defense counsel moved for a mistrial. The jury was called into open court…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Anderson v. BellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  4. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bruce E. Ellis v. Amos E. Reed, Secretary of Corrections, and the Attorney General of the State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  2. State v. BroaduxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  3. State v. GardnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Cole v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. State v. StarksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API