State v. Sanders
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Presiding Judge.
A jury found defendant guilty of felonious assault and the trial court sentenced *40him to five years’ imprisonment. On appeal defendant raises a single point — that the trial court erred in giving the “hammer instruction” (MAI-CR 1.10) after it had learned the jurors were deadlocked at nine to three for conviction. The relevant proceedings:
After deliberating two hours the jury foreman sent the judge a note saying, “The Jury can’t agree on a verdict. There are 9 for guilty and 3 for not guilty.” Defense counsel moved for a mistrial. The jury was called into open court…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Anderson v. BellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bruce E. Ellis v. Amos E. Reed, Secretary of Corrections, and the Attorney General of the State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- State v. BroaduxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- State v. GardnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Cole v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. StarksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.