BONNIE S. v. Altman
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAROKIN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This case presents the unique question of whether a person confined to a mental institution must obtain the consent of his or her appointed guardian to challenge that commitment and confinement. The issue is complicated where the guardian is an agency of the state or is appointed by an agency of the state. Ancient and recent times are rife with stories of persons wrongfully confined to mental hospitals and institutions. No more vital right exists in our society than the ability to challenge those commitments through adequate due process. To require…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. BartonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Guardianship of WaltersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Quada v. QuadaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Sigel AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Westerdale Ex Rel. Herfordt v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Caliendo v. VelezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Heichelbech v. EvansDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1992