Legal Opinion

Stalcup v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 8, 1936No. 17773Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

As first ground of his motion for rehearing appellant again urges that error was committed by the trial court in permitting the State to show prior indictments of appellant for various felonies, convictions thereof, and unserved sentences thereunder. We remain of opinion that the holding of our own court in Welk v. State, 99 Texas Crim. Rep., 235, 265 S. W., 914, and Vines v. State, 67 Texas Crim. Rep., 355, 148 S. W., 727, supports the action of the trial court. The reasoning in the case of People v. Scheck, 356 Ill., 56, 190 N. E., 108, 91 A. L. R.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The People v. ScheckIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Welk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Vines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Marinkovich v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API