Legal Opinion
(PS) Gigena v. Rye
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 1, 2023No. 2:23-cv-01662Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GABRIEL GIGENA, No. 2:23-cv-01662-DJC-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 STEPHEN B. RYE ET AL., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding without counsel in this action, requests leave to proceed in forma 18 pauperis (“IFP”).1 (ECF No. 2.) See
28 U.S.C. § 1915
(authorizing the commencement of an 19 action “without prepayment of fees or security” by a person who is unable to pay such fees). 20 However, because venue does not lie in this district, the court orders that this action be transferred 21 to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hernandez v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Nevada v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Edward Rabatin v. Columbus Lines, Inc. And Union Carbide Corporation. Appeal of Columbus Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Ali v. Carnegie Institution of WashingtonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Grand Blanc Education Association v. Grand Blanc Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980