Legal Opinion
Olson v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided February 3, 1986No. Civ. No. F 85-397PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM C. LEE, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s Motion to Stay Proceedings and to Compel Arbitration filed on November 8, 1985. The motion has been fully briefed and a hearing on this matter was held on December 10, 1985. In a telephone conference held on December 12, 1985, plaintiff’s counsel contended that there existed further discrepancies in the form of agreement that plaintiff signed vis-a-vis the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s regulation, 17 C.F.R. § 180.3, as amended in 1983. Plaintiff's counsel was therefore given five days to bring those…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Sauer-Getriebe Kg, Cross-Appellant v. White Hydraulics, Inc., Harvey C. White and Hollis N. White, Jr., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Hughes Masonry Co. v. Greater Clark County School Building Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Harold Ames v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. And Christopher v. StreitCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Martha Olson v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986