Legal Opinion

Slater v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 3, 1993No. CR-92-1453PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, Archie Slater, appeals from the summary denial of his petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P.

The appellant presented several grounds for relief in his petition. The appellant argued that there was insufficient evidence to find him guilty of sodomy and that his counsel's performance was ineffective in failing to object to the state's failure to prove the victim's age. He also argued in his petition that he had received ineffective assistance of counsel because, he says, the state presented, without objection, evidence of sexual misconduct…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Pitts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Slater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  4. Ex Parte SlaterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Slater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  2. Slater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  3. Slater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API