Legal Opinion

Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 4, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming.

Appellants own a four-hundred acre farm situated on the Big Sandy river about nine miles south of Catlettsburg. For several years appellee has owned and been in possession of a right of way through his farm. Upon this right of way was a single line of railway track. For some time it has been engaged in double-tracking its system for the purpose of keeping up with the increasing *340traffic. To carry out this object, it has adopted the plan of constructing second or switch tracks at numerous points along the line, with the view of connecting them in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. ScompCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Big Sandy & Kentucky River Railway Co. v. StaffordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  2. Collins v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API