Legal Opinion

Preston v. Bell Trucking

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 9, 1998No. 4-97-0526PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin

In law, as in life, a few simple rules make everything run more smoothly. Two of those rules would have made a world of difference in the instant case: Read the instructions. Play by the rules. The defendant, Bell Trucking, failed to follow either of these rules. It failed to file an appearance with the Illinois Industrial Commission (Commission) before taking any action in a worker’s compensation case. And it definitely did not follow the statute’s mandate. As a result, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court in favor of the plaintiff, Robert Preston.

The facts in this matter are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kleiboeker v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Preston v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ILLINOISAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Preston v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ILLINOISAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API