Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Brinson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from city court of Milieu — Judge T. L. Hill. April 19, 1915.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
Perhaps it is unnecessary to discuss the rulings stated in the headnotes, and yet I think it proper to state that to my mind the statements of the engineer and the conductor, referred to in the fourth headnote, to which objection was offered upon the ground that they were hearsay, were properly admitted as part of the res gestae of the homicide; and it is upon this ground that I prefer to place my concurrence in the ruling thereon, rather than to rest it solely upon the reason stated in the headnote. I agree to the correctness of the rule stated by learned counsel for the plaintiff in error,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Trapnell v. BirdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Collins v. Strickland Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Dyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- T. D. Slater Contracting Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.