Legal Opinion

Neubauer v. American Seating Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York

Decided January 8, 1909No. 243PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

This is a motion by the plaintiff for judgment on the grounds that the amended answer is frivolous and sham. The amended answer contains a general denial of any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of each and every allegation in said complaint contained, and it also contains separate and independent defenses, which the plaintiff claims to be inconsistent with the general denials. The cases cited in the briefs relating to sham and frivolous answers are not harmonious, though the subject has frequently been discussed by the appellate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wayland v. . TysenNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Rochkind v. PerlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Youngs v. . KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. City of New York v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Robert Gere Bank v. InmanNew York Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API