May v. . Gentry

The plaintiff alleged that there was a conspiracy between the defendant and one William May, fraudulently to deprive him of his horse, and called several witnesses who testified that they were at the storehouse of the defendant when a trade for the horse in question was spoken of between the plaintiff and William May; that the contract proposed was that William May should pay $27 in specie and $175 besides for the horse; that the $27 in specie and $100 of the balance was to be paid down before the trade took place and that on the payment of $127 the plaintiff was to take the bond of William…