Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Goldstein

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1976No. Appeals, Nos. 1333, 1334 and 1335 C.D. 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson,

These three appeals involve identical facts as these facts relate to the controlling legal issues. As the matters stand before us now, the appellees have filed a motion to *436dismiss and quash this appeal from the Court of Common Pleas on the grounds that the decree from which the appeal is taken is interlocutory. This was the decree entered September 9, 1975, which dismissed appellant’s motion to quash appellees’ appeal from the Municipal Court to the Court of Common Pleas filed on December 19, 1974, within the 30 days in which the Common Pleas Court had granted them…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Luckenbach v. LUCKENBACHSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Nardo v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Thru-Way Equipment Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Development Corp. v. Planning CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Board of Public Education v. GoldsteinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API