Legal Opinion

KATAN v. City of Prescott

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 3, 2009No. 1 CA-CV 09-0611 ELPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRVINE, Judge.

¶ 1 This ease concerns a challenge to the general election ballot for the 2009 City of Prescott election. Paul Katan argues that he should have been listed as one of six candidates on that ballot. The City disputes this because Katan was not one of the six candidates receiving the highest number of votes in the primary election. The trial court agreed with Katan and ordered the City to include Katan on the ballot. Because we conclude that the City Charter does not provide for including Katan on the general election ballot, we reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 1

¶2…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Superior Court Ex Rel. Navajo CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Brown v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Tellez v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE MOVING ARIZONA'S ECONOMY v. BrewerArizona Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. HBA OF CENT. ARIZONA v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API