Legal Opinion

Powell v. Hansard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1950No. 16930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

“There are two essential requisites of a valid application for mandamus to enforce a right, viz.: the legal duty imposed on the defendants to do the thing they are asked to do; and a pecuniary loss to the plaintiff for which he can not be compensated in damages.” Atlantic Ice & Coal Corp. v. Decatur, 154 Ga. 882 (115 S. E. 912). Ordinaries may be compelled to perform ministerial duties imposed upon them by law. Head v. Waldrup, 193 Ga. 165 (17 S. E. 2d, 585). “To entitle one to the writ of mandamus, it must appear that he has a clear legal right to have performed the particular…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bailey v. McAlpinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Abrams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Sellers v. PageSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Ponder v. ShumansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Henson v. Airways Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  2. Jones v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  3. Undercofler v. ScottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API