Corning v. Maynard
Supreme Court of Iowa
'Appeal from Grundy District Court. — George W. Duni-iam, Judge. Action for damages for personal injuries alleged fo have been sustained in a collision between plaintiff’s motorcycle and the defendant’s automobile. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, there was a directed verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.
*' cOTUrilintoiThighways*!'fdiiuro to give statutory signals. The plaintiff, on his motorcycle, was driving east, toward Cedar Falls, The defendant was approaching the plaintiff from the east, and therefore was driving west. They were on opposite sides of the same hill, which was so steep that neither driver could see the other at-a greater distance than 100 feet, until one or both of them came to the crest of the hill. They met at the crest, and the collision resulted. The plaintiff did not in fact see the defendant until he was within 60 feet of him, although he might have seen him at the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Carlson v. MeusbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Huffman v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- Jakeway v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- Lang v. KollaschSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Lotz v. United Food Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.