Legal Opinion

People v. Berardi

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1964Published

1Opinion of the CourtAbraham N. Geller, J.

The letter of defendant’s attorney dated January 31, 1964 is treated as an application for reargument. [See 41 Misc 2d 736.]

The sole contention presently raised is with respect to the final ground urged by defendant in his motion to dismiss the indictment, that the indictment was defective for failure to allege intent on the part of defendant to commit the crime of criminal contempt or to defy the dignity and authority of the court.

Defendant argues that People v. Post Std. Co. (13 N Y 2d 185) is applicable to any criminal contempt. It was there held that it was necessary to plead intent in an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Bernstein v. La FetraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. People Ex Rel. Bernstein v. . La FetraNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. People v. BerardiNew York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API