Legal Opinion

Frevert v. Swift

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1886No. 1239PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, Ormsby County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

*364By the Court,

Hawley, J.:

The judge of the third judicial district court, who tried this cause, overruled defendant’s “ motion for a new trial upon the ground that no statement on motion for a new trial had been filed within the time required by law.” The notice of motion for a new trial was filed and served October 14, 1885, and thereafter, on the seventeenth of October, the judge of the second judicial district court, “who was disqualified to try said cause,” made an order extending the time in which to file and serve said statement on motion for a new trial. If this order extending the time…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hall v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. People ex rel. Carrillo v. De la GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. State ex rel. Claunch v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  4. Gains v. BarrTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Lacy v. BarrettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cougill v. SachsWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Johnson v. German America Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Board of Commissioners v. JusticeIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Murdica v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1914
  5. State Ex Rel. Schaw v. NoyesNevada Supreme Court · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API