Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dorian

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 1983No. 890PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from judgment of sentence for burglary. Appellant argues that the lower court (1) lacked jurisdiction to accept his guilty plea; (2) erred in refusing to allow him to withdraw his guilty plea; (3) imposed an illegal and excessive sentence; and (4) denied him effective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

Appellant was arrested on March 17, 1980, and charged with criminal attempt,1 criminal mischief,2 and burglary.3 *247He pleaded guilty to burglary and the Commonwealth moved to have the remaining charges nol prossed because they merged with the burglary. N.T. 5/6/80 at…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. ShafferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. ZuberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Rodriques v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ColesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. DorianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Zazo v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. EganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. KioskeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API