Commonwealth v. Dorian
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is an appeal from judgment of sentence for burglary. Appellant argues that the lower court (1) lacked jurisdiction to accept his guilty plea; (2) erred in refusing to allow him to withdraw his guilty plea; (3) imposed an illegal and excessive sentence; and (4) denied him effective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
Appellant was arrested on March 17, 1980, and charged with criminal attempt,1 criminal mischief,2 and burglary.3 *247He pleaded guilty to burglary and the Commonwealth moved to have the remaining charges nol prossed because they merged with the burglary. N.T. 5/6/80 at…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. ShafferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. ZuberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Rodriques v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ColesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. DorianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Zazo v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. EganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. KioskeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.