Sentman v. Gamble
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Cecil County. The opinion of the Court, together with the statement of Judge Bryan, filed at the January Term, 1888, and now reported, present the facts of the case very fully.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
The Court ordered this case to be re-argued, and a majority of the Judges who heard the re-argument are of opinion the judgment should be affirmed.
*297The note sued on was given in payment for wood, growing and standing upon a certain tract of woodland, sold by the plaintiff, Sentman, to the defendants Gamble and Logan. The subject-matter of the sale being growing wood or timber, it was a sale of goods only. Smith vs. Bryan, 5 Md., 141.
The plaintiff having proved the execution of the note, the defendants then offered in evidence a contract for the sale of the wood, which was in writing and dated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Gibbs v. GaleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
- Groff v. HanselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
- Atwell v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
- President of the Farmers Bank v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1835
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. LeasureCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Duvall v. RidoutCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Board of Trustees v. RTKL Associates, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Wald v. WaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
- Chesapeake Brewing Co. v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.