Legal Opinion
The Rochester
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 10, 1934No. 13588Published
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This suit is brought to recover damages alleged to have been caused by collision.
Ownership and incorporation of the respective parties as alleged in the pleadings proven as alleged.
The tug Rochester was, during the currency of process hereunder, within this district and the jurisdiction of this court, and jurisdiction is conceded.
The Erie Railroad Company tug Rochester was a Diesel tug, and her engine controls were located in the pilot house.
On the night of September 28, 1932, the tug Rochester picked up, on the starboard side of the tug, in New York, a earfloat…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The Crown of GaliciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Cornell Steamboat Co. v. Phœnix Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- The Jersey CentralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929