Legal Opinion

Abraham v. Harry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 8, 1917No. 7224PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Creek County; Wade S. 'Stanfield, Judge. Action by Frazier Harry, a minor, suing by his guardian, H. M. Ausmus, against Joe Abraham and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This is an action brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error to recover for the1 breach of two bonds given oy a guardian. Hereinafter the parties will be designated as they were in' the trial court.

The material allegations of the petition are that Wheaton Harry was duly appointed guardian of the plaintiff-in the county court of Creek county, Okla., and soon thereafter qualified, and entered upon the discharge of his duties, and that he executed a bond, conditioned as required by law, with the defendants Harry Lowrance and Wash Sanders as his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dugger v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
  2. Powell v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Matthews v. MauldinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  4. People's Bank & Trust Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. PonderTexas Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sheel v. IngramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Francis v. SperrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Furgerson v. RenfrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Abraham v. HarrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API