Legal Opinion

Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. Robinson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 25, 1917No. 1705PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the facts as above). Appellee predicates the right of recovery for the loss of the dwelling and goods as upon a contract of renewal of her policy of April 5, 1913, expiring at noon April 5, 1914, before the fire. And the most important question in the appeal is whether, upon the facts, the appellee is entitled to recover. As found by the jury, T. M. Ken-sey orally agreed with appellee that he would keep her insurance in force by renewing the policy before the same would expire, the appellee to pay the premium for each renewal. And in the light of the evidence .it is made clear…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. More v. New York Bowery Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Cohen v. Continental Fire InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Hardwick v. State InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Croft v. Hanover Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Campbell v. American Fire Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Austin Fire Ins. Co. v. Adams-Childers Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. First Texas Prudential Insurance v. RyanTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Miller v. KempSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  4. &198tna Ins. Co. v. RicheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Republic Ins. Co. v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API