Legal Opinion

Duvall v. . Rollins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Civil action, for the recovery of certain personal property, claimed as a part of plaintiff’s homestead exemption, tried before Mitchell, X, at the Spring Term, 1872, of the Superior Court of Ashe county. Under the instructions of his Honor, on the trial in the .'Superior Court, the jury returned a verdict for the defendant. Motion for a new trial. Motion refused. Judgment •and appeal by plaintiff. The facts in the case are fully set out in the opinion of ■the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBoyden, J.

This case involved a new question touching the plaintiff’s personal property exemption. It is agreed that the property in dispute had been the property of plaintiff, and that on the 5th of October, 1870, the plaintiff sold and transferred the property in controversy to one Aker* his son-in-law, upon the consideration that his said son-in-law should support the plaintiff, who is an old man, and plaintiff’s wife, during their declining years, and also pay off the plaintiff’s debts, as soon as he could. That about, the 25th day of October, 1870, the sheriff of said county* having executions…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Duvall v. . RollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  2. Rankin v. . ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. Elder v. WilliamsNevada Supreme Court · 1882
  4. State Ex Rel. McD. Pate & Co. v. HarperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Etheridge v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API