Carpenter v. Harris
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ottawa. (Arnold, J.) Foeoible detainer. Defendant brings error. As to the insufficiency of the complaint for want of essential facts: Bryan v. Smith 10 Mich. 229; Allen v. Carpenter 15 Mich. 32.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
This was a special proceeding to aid a. guardian in resuming possession of real estate of his wards, from which he had been forcibly ousted by an administrator of their deceased mother. The case was tried below upon the supposition, on the part of defendant, that the Act of' 1881, giving possession in certain cases to executors and administrators, was retroactive, and the removal to this-Court seems to have been made in ignorance of the decision of Van Fleet v. Van Fleet 49 Mich. 610, which had not then been published. The court below properly held that in this case the possessory rights of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Van Fleet v. Van FleetMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reason v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Chylowski v. SteinbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Newton v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Olmstead v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- In Re Logan's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.