Legal Opinion
TECHNIPLEX III v. VILLAGE OF EAST ROCHESTER
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 6, 2015No. CA 14-00217Published
1Opinion of the Court
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1366 CA 14-00217 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF TECHNIPLEX III, A PARTNERSHIP, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TOWN AND VILLAGE OF EAST ROCHESTER, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.) LACY KATZEN LLP, ROCHESTER (JOHN T. REFERMAT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. WARD GREENBERG HELLER & REIDY LLP, ROCHESTER (DANIEL P. PURCELL OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- FMC Corp. v. UnmackNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Allied Corp. v. Town of CamillusNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Merrick Holding Corp. v. Board of AssessorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- 41 Kew Gardens Road Associates v. TyburskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Commerce Holding Corp. v. Board of AssessorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.