Legal Opinion

Olmstead v. Olmstead

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Alonzo Gr. Hinkley, Official Beferee.

The above-entitled action was by order of Hon. Samuel W. Eageb, Justice of the Supreme Court, duly referred to Alonzo Gr. Hinkley, the undersigned Official Beferee, to hear and determine.

The plaintiff sets forth in her complaint four separate causes of action.

The parties are wife and husband and the parents of two minor children.

In the early part of 1946 the parties separated. On July 12, 1946, while the parties were living separate and apart, a written agreement of separation was entered into by them. That agreement has not been challenged and must be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Stoddard v. . StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re PintoNew York Family Court · 1952
  2. Olmstead v. OlmsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API