Legal Opinion

Lane v. Pacific Greyhound Lines

California Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1945No. S. F. 17079Published

1Opinion of the Court

26 Cal.2d 575 (1945)

NAOMI GAE LANE et al., Appellants,

v.

PACIFIC GREYHOUND LINES (a Corporation) et al., Respondents.

S. F. No. 17079.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

June 22, 1945.

F. H. Dam for Appellant.

Cooley, Crowley & Supple and T. H. DeLap for Respondents.

CARTER, J.

This is an action for damages for wrongful death. Plaintiffs are the widow and only children of John Harold Lane, who was killed when a bus owned by defendant Pacific Greyhound Lines and operated by defendant James C. Perkins collided with the automobile in which decedent was riding. From a judgment entered on the verdict…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Showalter v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Kimic v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Townsend v. ButterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Lane v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Froeming v. Stockton Electric R. R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API