Legal Opinion

Turner v. Houser

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 29, 1964No. 40886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

The contract between plaintiff and defendant, copy of which was attached to the petition, provided that “The owner agrees to pay the architect a total fee of seven (7) percent of [the] contract price.” The architect is obligated under the contract to furnish without additional cost to the owner all engineering and consulting services, the site planning, the living and transportation expenses of himself and his assistants and to hold all necessary conferences, make all preliminary studies, and prepare all working drawings, specifications, keep construction accounts, supervise…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shubert v. SpeirSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. The DARLINGTON CORP. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  3. Southern Land, Timber & Pulp Corp. v. Davis & Floyd Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. Ryals v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  5. Allison v. AllmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reddix v. Chatham County Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Walker v. Joanna M. Knox & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Crankshaw v. Stanley Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Crankshaw v. Stanley Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API