Legal Opinion

Kirkpatrick v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1927No. Docket No. 4661Published

1Opinion of the Court

McLUCAS, J.,

pro tem. — Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal after demurrer had been sustained to plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint with leave to amend, and plaintiff had failed to amend his complaint. The demurrer was both general and special.

It is alleged in the complaint that the parties entered into a certain contract on the twenty-fifth day of March, 1922, wherein the defendant agreed to furnish plaintiff an oil engine, together with appliances and equipment specified in said contract, and to furnish a competent erector for installing the said engine and appliances, and to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lichtenthaler v. Samson Iron WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  2. Cohn v. Bessemer Gas Engine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API