Legal Opinion

Ives v. McNicoll

Ohio Circuit Courts

Decided January 15, 1896Published

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County Ohio. /

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The question in this case is simply this-. Whether on the facts found by the trial court, Margaret C. McNicoll, the defendant in error, is the legitimate daughter of Henry Mc-Nicoll, deceased, and therefore as such entitled to a share *298in the real estate in this city, described in the petition in the case, which was devised by the will of Peter McNicoll, deceased, to his son, the said Henry McNicoll, for his lifetime, and at his decease to go to the heirs of his body in fee simple. The facts as found by the trial court, material to the case, briefly stated are these: Peter McNicoll at the time…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Cope v. CopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Lessee of Brewer v. BlougherSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  4. Sams v. Sams' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  5. Harris v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API