Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Allen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Linn County.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Watson, C. J.:

The denial of “any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief” was a good denial,under the statute,and has been so held by this court. (Civil Code, sec. 713; Robbins v. Baker, 2 Or., 52; Sherman v. Osborn, 8 Or., 66.) But the issue thus joined was immaterial. If the respondent was a surety only on the first note secured by the mortgage executed by the principal debtor to Smith, Brassfi’eld & Co., that fact would not of itself entitle him to control the application of the proceeds of sale of the property covered by the mortgage. It is true that considerable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mathews v. SwitzlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  2. Dixon v. ClayvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  3. Belcher v. Hartford BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
  4. Robbins v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Sherman v. OsbornOregon Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. First National Bank of Milwaukee v. FinckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Gile Grocery Co. v. LachmundOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Colburn v. BarrettOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Wood v. NoyesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API