In Re Big Gold Water Drainage District
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Daniels, J., at August Term, 1912, of CabarriJs.
1Opinion of the CourtClaRK, C. J.
Tbis is a proceeding under the General Drainage Act, ch. 442, Laws 1909. The petitioners, fifty-eight in number, filed their petition, duly signed, and setting out the necessary allegations. The summons was served upon nine others in the district who did not join in the petition. Under section 3 of the act, and after hearing objections, the order was made establishing the drainage district and appointing the board of viewers. Upon objections filed, the clerk confirmed the report of the viewers, and an appeal was taken to the judge. At term an issue was submitted to the jury, upon the only…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Board of Trustees v. WebbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Yeates v. . ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rouse v. City of KinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Banks v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Shelton v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Reed Coal Co. v. FainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Shelton v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.