Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Canty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 6, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant, a security officer, variously testified that he did not report to work as scheduled because he needed to earn more money and had sustained certain injuries during a prior confrontation with a coworker. The case law makes clear, however, that neither dissatisfaction with one’s wages (see Matter of Feliciano [Commissioner of Labor], 39 AD3d 1115, 1116 [2007]; Matter of Bollweg [Commissioner of Labor], 288 AD2d 811 [2001]) nor conflicts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re CaseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re the Claim of OdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of FelicianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. In re the Claim of BollwegAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of WoodchekeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Matter of Cunningham (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Matter of Gilyard (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API