Legal Opinion
Grant v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided October 24, 2007No. 09-06-172 CRPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID GAULTNEY, Justice.
Kiheem Grant was convicted of murder. The jury assessed punishment at incarceration for life and a fine in the amount of $10,000.
Grant raises six issues in this appeal. In his first two issues, Grant argues the trial court did not properly warn him of the dangers of self-representation, and through his deficient self-representation, he contributed to his own conviction. In issue three, he complains of the shackles used to restrain him during the trial. In issue four, he raises error in the procedure followed for his opening statement. In issues five and six, he…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mark Dolph v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013
- Taylor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2008
- Morris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Powell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2010
- Aaron Rene Glasspoole v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.