Legal Opinion

Norton & Siegel, Inc. v. Nolan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 1938PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

This action was brought to recover a sum in excess of $4,600 but the judgment of the referee awarded a lesser amount. In plaintiff’s notice of appeal to the Appellate Division occurs this language: “plaintiff appeals from so much of said decision and judgment as decides and adjudges that the plaintiff have and recover from the defendant the sum of $1,574.25.” The notice of appeal also states that plaintiff will bring up for review its exceptions to the referee’s refusal of its requests to find facts and to make conclusions of law and also its exceptions to the findings and conclusions “in so…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hooper v. . BeecherNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Oppenheimer v. Carabaya Rubber & Navigation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Bloch v. BlochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Roldan v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Silber v. SilberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Hatsis v. HatsisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Araujo v. AraujoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API