Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McConaga

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 13, 2011No. Nos. 10-P-459 & 10-P-579PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFecteau, J.

The issue in these appeals by the defendant and *525the Commonwealth is whether the Commonwealth’s motion to reconsider, filed sixty-six days following the entry of a Superior Court order allowing the defendant’s motion to suppress, along with its appeal from the denial of reconsideration, is sufficient to bring an appeal from the allowance of the suppression motion properly before us, under the provisions of G. L. c. 278, § 28E, or Mass.R.Crim.P. 15(a)(2), as appearing in 422 Mass. 1501 (1996). Given the record on appeal, we hold that in the absence of (1) a timely filed notice of appeal in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Commonwealth v. MontanezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. AlvaradoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. PattonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. RossMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API