Legal Opinion

Hiester v. Maderia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1842PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR to the Common Pleas of Berks county. John Miller, administrator of Michael Maderia, deceased, against John S. Hiester. The facts of this case, and the questions of law raised, are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Huston, J.

This was an action arising on the following statement of facts:

John S. Hiester and Michael Maderia, about 1813, had agreed to purchase certain lands in partnership. Afterwards, on the 23d of March 1818, they executed a writing or agreement, as follows :

“ John S. Hiester having, at the request of Michael Maderia, purchased for himself and Mr Maderia, nine tracts of land on Deep Creek, in Mahonlonga and Norwegian townships, Schuylkill county, from Joseph Reed, for which the said Hiester paid; and of which two-thirds is the property of the said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Colwell v. WoodsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  2. Wharf v. HowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1813

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Slowey v. McMurraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  2. Houser v. LamontSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
  3. Huoncker v. MerkeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  4. Appeal of MiskiminsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  5. Price's Heirs v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API