Legal Opinion

Vise v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 14, 1988No. 01-87-00795-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHEN, Justice.

Vise appeals from a take-nothing judgment rendered in a non-jury trial.

In a suit for tortious interference with a business contract, appellant submitted to appellee requests for admissions that ap-pellee never answered. Appellee filed no motion to withdraw, amend, or extend the time to answer them. At trial, the court granted appellant’s motion to deem the requests admitted. Appellant then presented evidence that appellee had wrongly interfered with his employment contract with Nitrogen Coil Tubing (NCT) by firing him. Appellee presented contrary evidence, including…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Shaw v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
  3. Laycox v. Jaroma, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
  4. Smith v. Home Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Pathfinder Personnel Service, Inc. v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marshall v. ViseTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Satterfield v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. CHCA Woman's Hospital, L.P. D/B/A Woman's Hospital of Texas v. Nema Uwaydah, M.D., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API