Commonwealth Ex Rel. Oncay v. Oncay
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
After hearing the argument on this appeal, we are of one mind, that the best interest of the three-year-old girl, whose custody is here involved — which is the main consideration governing our action — requires a rehearing of the case by the court below, at which time the mother of the child can be fully heard, and examined and cross-examined with respect to matters relating to her personal care of the child and affecting her fitness to have custody of her. We must point out again, however, that reports of investigators, agents, and doctors cannot be received in evidence, or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. McClenen v. McClenenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ritter v. RitterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Knode v. KnodeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Com. Ex Rel. Mark v. MarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Commonwealth v. VarnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
3Cited by32 opinions
- Holmes' AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- In Interest of JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Wood v. TUCKERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Kessler v. GregorySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kuntz v. StackhouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.